Author |
Message |
04/17/2013 20:27:17
|
michaelx
neo
Joined: 12/19/2012 19:17:27
Messages: 3
Offline
|
hi,
When we use bigm as a datastore, we found that our speed of insertion is only 2000record/sec, but we need it reach about 10krec/sec, is there any suggestion for us?
record size : 2~4k
record field number: 150+
index: 100+
any suggestion are appreicated
michaelx
|
|
|
04/29/2013 00:32:20
|
gyan10
ophanim
Joined: 06/28/2011 23:15:25
Messages: 701
Offline
|
Ideally, it should be.BigM GO is very fast. Could you share your configurations?
I dont see any reason it is not reaching 10K rec/sec.
Cheers!!!
|
Gyan Awasthi
Terracotta -A Software AG company |
|
|
07/04/2013 04:37:36
|
michaelx
neo
Joined: 12/19/2012 19:17:27
Messages: 3
Offline
|
hi,
We use off-heap feature of BigM, and we wonder that if creating indexes is the bottleneck of insertion, beacause the indexes is stored on local disk, and here is my configuration:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ehcache xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="ehcache.xsd"
updateCheck="false" monitoring="autodetect"
dynamicConfig="true">
<diskStore path="/home/user/disk"/>
<cache name="alarmCache"
overflowToOffHeap="true"
maxBytesLocalOffHeap="10g"
maxBytesLocalHeap="1g"
eternal="false">
<persistence strategy="none"/>
<!-- Following are definition of 150+ searchable fields
<searchable/>
-->
</cache>
</ehcache>
Thx in advance
michaelx
|
|
|
07/08/2013 22:19:15
|
kawaanto
neo
Joined: 04/26/2013 02:06:03
Messages: 1
Offline
|
michaelx wrote:
hi,
When we use bigm as a datastore, we found that our speed of insertion is only 2000record/sec, but we need it reach about 10krec/sec, is there any suggestion for us?
record size : 2~4k
record field number: 150+
index: 100+
any suggestion are appreicated
michaelx
Hi,you guys!
I'm new be here.Esky
Is here anyone deleting comments or to change the topic?
This could really be fantastic.Isn't it?
|
|
|
|