Terracotta Discussion Forums

Hello,

I want the equivalent of the toolkit's ClusteredMap but using Ehcache (since Ehcache is more friendly when supporting serializable keys (and the latter also has local key caching). I came up with:
Code:

CacheConfiguration cfg = new CacheConfiguration(name, 100).eternal(true).terracotta(new TerracottaConfiguration()).pinning(new PinningConfiguration().store(Store.INCACHE));

Have I overlooked something?

Thanks

Nicolas

Hi,
we are also using ClusteredMap but if ehcache can provide a configuration similar to this one it would be a nice news to avoid using both ehcache and terracotta toolkit.

By the way, it seems terracotta advises to use EhcachE instead of Terracotta Toolkit so they could provide a way to "migrate".

can somebody confirm nicolas assumption ?

Ehcache is a map based implementation on its own and Terracotta + Ehcache = clustered Ehcache. So I am not sure what is the real concern here. Do you see any exceptions or errors while configuring Ehcache?

I suggest to look at our web docs: http://ehcache.org/documentation

Hi,
we have seen different performances between a ClusteredMap and the default distributed Ehcache configuration

In my use case, i have seen that terracotta map has better performance than ehcache [mainly write], so I guess that some configuration is slightly different.

I guess some configuration of ehcache allows to mimic the default terracotta map for example :
Is there a L1 when using a terracotta map ? (i have seen a parameter for this in ehcache)
The consistency, pinning, synchonous write, ... ?

I would know which configuration should I use to use Ehcache instead of ClusteredMap (and keep the behavior/performances).